The court has reviewed the record.
The People v. Exact Change
THE CHARGE
Premeditated Financial Ambush
THE CASE
A promising dinner ended with a payment request for exactly $3.42—the cost of the sparkling water one person tasted.
THE EVIDENCE
EXHIBIT A
“A promising dinner ended with a payment request for exactly $3.42—the cost of the sparkling water one person tasted.”
QUESTION BEFORE THE COURT
Was the $3.42 request reasonable?
THE COURT’S RULING
GUILTY
61/100
CHAOS
CHAOS
The conduct on the record supports the charge.
THE SENTENCE
Make one clear request, then let the follow-through deliver the final answer.
“The behavior gets the deciding vote.”
YOUR TURN, JUROR
WHAT SAY YOU?
Results appear after you vote.