THE INTERNET
IS NOW
IN SESSION
PUBLIC CASES
THE DOCKET
Anonymous situations. Sanitized evidence. Court rulings—and then the jury gets a vote.
Power trip
The People v. The Office Menace
“Been with a company for years But we have a new MP Im definitely in his corner as he is my boss.”
JURY · 100% YOU ALREADY KNOW
Breadcrumbing in the First Degree
The People v. The Pen Pal
“Three weeks of daily good-morning texts have produced zero actual dates and a fresh excuse every Friday.”
JURY · 100% GUILTY
Premeditated Financial Ambush
The People v. Exact Change
“A promising dinner ended with a payment request for exactly $3.42—the cost of the sparkling water one person tasted.”
Felony Ambiguous Posting
The People v. The Soft Launch
“After four dates, one person posted two coffee cups, a mystery sleeve, and a heart—then denied soft-launching anything.”
Aggravated After-Hours Intentions
The People v. The Midnight Romantic
“The profile says long-term relationship, but every invitation arrives after 1 a.m. and never includes a real plan.”
Suspicion of Being Emotionally Available
The People v. A Healthy Pace
“Two recently divorced people meet once a week, communicate clearly, and make the next plan before saying goodnight.”
Floral Expense Misconduct
The People v. The Reimbursed Bouquet
“A date brought flowers, then added half their cost to the dinner payment request.”
Unauthorized Midnight Reentry
The People v. 1:17 A.M.
“An ex who has been silent for eight months sent “you up?” at 1:17 a.m. and deleted it by breakfast.”
Aggravated Nostalgia
The People v. The Five-Page Letter
“A returned sweater arrived six months after the breakup with five pages about closure, timing, and one specific memory.”
Digital Trespassing in the Third Degree
The People v. The Archive Visitor
“An ex liked several photos from three years ago, then removed every like before morning.”
Failure to Apologize with Intent
The People v. The Meme Apology
“After reopening an old wound, an ex sent a meme about being bad at feelings instead of acknowledging what happened.”
Recycling a Failed Arrangement
The People v. The Same Old Plan
“An ex returned promising change, but proposed the exact casual arrangement that ended badly the first time.”
Possession of Suspiciously Normal Closure
The People v. The Spare Key
“An ex found an old apartment key, returned it promptly, and asked for nothing except confirmation that it arrived.”
Grand Theft Leftovers
The People v. The Labeled Leftovers
“A spouse ate the takeout container labeled “TOMORROW—PLEASE DO NOT EAT” and called the note emotionally aggressive.”
Conspiracy to Third-Wheel an Anniversary
The People v. The Surprise Plus-One
“An anniversary trip for two became a trip for three after one spouse invited their mother without asking.”
Premeditated Budget Evasion
The People v. The Secret Purchase
“A large household purchase appeared on the shared card after both spouses had agreed to discuss anything over $500.”
Excessive Administrative Response
The People v. The Chore Spreadsheet
“One spouse made a color-coded chore spreadsheet after months of missed tasks; the other called it controlling.”
Unlawful Dessert Possession
The People v. The Last Slice
“Both spouses thought the last birthday-cake slice was theirs, and there is no reliable witness or label.”
Aggravated Boundary Crossing
The People v. The Private Story
“A spouse shared a private disagreement with friends after explicitly promising to keep it between the two of them.”
Conspiracy to Split the Check Unfairly
The People v. The Equal Split
“One friend ordered water and fries; the rest ordered cocktails and entrees, then insisted the bill be divided equally.”
Negligent Wardrobe Handling
The People v. The Borrowed Dress
“A borrowed dress came back stained in a bag with no note, no cleaning, and no mention of what happened.”
Unauthorized Itinerary Control
The People v. The Trip Planner
“One friend planned the entire group trip and finally booked the restaurant after three unanswered deadline reminders.”
Distribution of Confidential Tea
The People v. The Screenshot
“A private message was dropped into another group chat for laughs, with the sender’s name still visible.”
Failure to Attend with Mitigating Circumstances
The People v. The Birthday Cancellation
“A close friend canceled a birthday dinner for a genuine family emergency and immediately proposed another night.”
Vehicular Hospitality Abuse
The People v. The Empty Tank
“A friend borrowed a car for the weekend and returned it with six miles of gas and three fast-food bags.”
Grand Theft PowerPoint
The People v. The Credit Thief
“A coworker presented an idea from a private brainstorm as their own while the original author sat in the meeting.”
Unauthorized Botanical Relocation
The People v. The Desk Plant
“A coworker moved someone else’s desk plant across the office because it “looked better near the window.””
Reckless Use of Reply All
The People v. Reply All
“One employee used Reply All to correct a tiny mistake in front of 86 colleagues instead of sending a private note.”
Temporary Calendar Obstruction
The People v. The Calendar Hold
“A coworker placed a tentative hold on a shared meeting slot, then confirmed it within the agreed deadline.”
Late Filing of Lunch Intent
The People v. The Lunch Order
“A team order arrived missing one meal because the organizer overlooked a message sent after the stated cutoff.”
Aggravated Failure to Respect Offline Hours
The People v. The Weekend Ping
“A manager labeled a Saturday request “not urgent,” then followed up twice before Sunday morning.”
Retroactive Hospitality Billing
The People v. The Cleaning Fee
“A sister hosted a family weekend, then sent everyone an equal cleaning invoice without mentioning any fee beforehand.”
Revocation of Unfunded Entertainment Access
The People v. The Streaming Password
“A sibling changed the shared streaming password after paying alone for six months and warning everyone twice.”
Aggravated Boundary Crossing
The People v. The Unapproved Photo
“An aunt posted an unflattering family photo after being asked directly not to share it.”
Unlawful Entry by Guilt Trip
The People v. The Surprise Visit
“A parent arrived for a weekend stay with two hours’ notice and called the locked guest room unwelcoming.”
Attempted Plus-One Expansion
The People v. The Wedding Plus-One
“A cousin assumed a new partner was invited to a small wedding even though the invitation named one guest.”